Stakeholders’ Participation in Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) and Performance of Water Supply Projects in Australia: Evidence from Cotter Dam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5282Abstract
Stakeholders' Participation in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is a critical factor in determining the performance and success of projects across various sectors. Effective stakeholder engagement ensures that the voices and perspectives of all relevant parties, such as government agencies, local communities, NGOs, and consumers, are heard and considered throughout the project lifecycle. By actively involving stakeholders in the M&E process, projects benefit from their valuable insights, leading to better-informed decision-making, improved project design, and enhanced transparency. Ultimately, this collaborative approach contributes to more efficient and sustainable project outcomes, addressing the diverse needs and interests of the stakeholders involved. The study adopted the descriptive research design. The target population was 250 stakeholders in Water Supply Project (Cotter Dam) in Australia. The study did sampling of 220 respondents that were chosen from the target population of 250 stakeholders of Cotter Dam in Australia. Questionnaires were used to gather the data. In conclusion, the evidence from the Cotter Dam project in Australia underscores the critical importance of stakeholder participation in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) for the successful execution of water supply projects. Active involvement of stakeholders, including government bodies, environmental organizations, local communities, and consumers, leads to improved decision-making, transparency, and accountability throughout a project's lifecycle. By embracing lessons from the Cotter Dam, future water supply projects can adopt more inclusive, transparent, and collaborative approaches, ultimately ensuring the continued success and sustainability of critical infrastructure initiatives. The study recommended that to enhance the effectiveness of stakeholder participation in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) for water supply projects in Australia, it is crucial to establish robust communication channels that engage a diverse range of stakeholders, from government agencies to local communities. Additionally, clear policies and guidelines should be implemented to ensure mandatory stakeholder involvement and accountability, fostering a more inclusive, transparent, and successful project execution.
Keywords: Stakeholders’ Participation, M&E, Performance, Projects, Australia
References
Amanuel, R. (2022). Assessing Challenges And Practices Of Monitoring And Evaluation In Projects: case Study of Catholic Relief Services (Doctoral Dissertation, St. Mary’s University).
Betta, J., & Boronina, L. (2018, December). Transparency in project management–from traditional to agile. In Third International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2018) (pp. 446-449). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/febm-18.2018.103
Ching, H. Y., & Gerab, F. (2021). Assessment of the sustainability reports: evidence from brazilian listed companies. Decent work and economic growth, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95867-5_64
Didham, R. J., & Ofei-Manu, P. (2020). Facilitating collaborative partnerships in education policy research: A case of multi-stakeholder, co-investigation for monitoring and evaluation of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(7), 2787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072787
Gupta, A. D., Pandey, P., Feijóo, A., Yaseen, Z. M., & Bokde, N. D. (2020). Smart water technology for efficient water resource management: A review. Energies, 13(23), 6268. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236268
Herath, S. K., & Herath, L. M. (2023). Key Success Factors for Implementing Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects. In Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Through Infrastructure Development (pp. 1-38). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0794-6.ch001
Kabeyi, M. J. B. (2019). Evolution of project management, monitoring and evaluation, with historical events and projects that have shaped the development of project management as a profession. Int J Sci Res, 8(12), 63-79.
Kusters, K., Buck, L., de Graaf, M., Minang, P., van Oosten, C., & Zagt, R. (2018). Participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation of multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. Environmental management, 62(1), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0847-y
Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. (2022). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10079
Malik, S. H., Fu, W., Rasool, S. F., Wani, G. A., Zaman, S., & Wani, N. A. (2023). Investigating the Impact of Communication Factors and Stakeholders Engagement on Renewable Energy Projects in Pakistan. Sustainability, 15(14), 11289. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411289
Sherman, M. H., & Ford, J. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: an evaluation of projects in developing nations. Climate Policy, 14(3), 417-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.859501
Torre, A., Sabir, M., & Pham, H. V. (2021). Socioeconomic conflicts and land-use issues in context of infrastructural projects: The example of Diamer Basha Dam project in Pakistan. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 5, 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-020-00157-5
Yadav, P. K. (2023). Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Practices in Nepal: Critical Discourses.
Zaucha, J., & Kreiner, A. (2021). Engagement of stakeholders in the marine/maritime spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 132, 103394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.12.013
