Comparing Public Procurement Transparency Mechanisms Between EU Member States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2450Abstract
This article examined the transparency mechanisms in public procurement across European Union (EU) member states, focusing on their implementation, effectiveness, and challenges. Public procurement transparency, essential for reducing corruption and fostering fair competition, was found to vary significantly among member states due to differences in digital infrastructure, regulatory compliance, and local administrative capacities. Case studies from Germany, France, Poland, and Hungary illustrated these variations, with countries like Germany and Denmark demonstrating robust digital procurement systems that enabled open access to procurement data and improved accountability. In contrast, countries such as Poland and Hungary faced ongoing challenges with regional disparities and limited enforcement, impacting their ability to maintain transparency consistently. The analysis revealed that successful transparency mechanisms generally included accessible e-procurement platforms, public disclosure requirements, and strong regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations were suggested to promote harmonized transparency standards across the EU, emphasizing the need for technical support, capacity-building at regional levels, and a balanced approach to transparency and data protection. Overall, while transparency mechanisms have strengthened public procurement outcomes within the EU, disparities in their implementation highlighted the need for continued EU guidance and support to achieve uniform standards across member states.
Keywords: Public procurement, Transparency, EU member states, Policy recommendations
References
Agence France Trésor. (2021). French Public Procurement and Transparency Standards. Ministry of Economy and Finance, France. Retrieved from https://www.economie.gouv.fr
Ágh, A. (2020). Transparency and Accountability in Hungarian Public Procurement: Issues and Reforms. Central European Political Studies Review, 32(1), 212-230.
European Anti-Fraud Office. (2018). Danish Procurement: Standards of Transparency and Anti-Corruption Measures. European Anti-Fraud Office Reports.
European Commission. (2019). Addressing Discrepancies in Public Procurement Transparency Mechanisms Among Member States. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu
European Commission. (2020). Evaluation of Public Procurement Practices in EU Member States. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu
European Commission. (2020). Public Procurement Strategy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu
European Commission. (2021). Procurement Transparency Mechanisms in France: Regional Disparities and Recommendations. European Commission Publications.
European Commission. (2021). Public Procurement Strategy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu
European Court of Auditors. (2020). Annual Report on the EU Budget – Implementation and Auditing Mechanisms. Retrieved from https://www.eca.europa.eu
European Data Protection Board. (2021). Balancing Transparency and Data Protection in Dutch Procurement Practices. EDPB Guidance Notes.
European Parliament. (2020). Report on Public Procurement Practices and Standards in Hungary. European Parliament
European Union. (2014). Directive 2014/24/EU on Public Procurement and Repealing Directive 2004/18/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 94, 65-242. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu
European Union. (2021). Digital Platforms in Public Procurement Across EU Member States. Official Journal of the European Union.
García de Enterría, E., & Echeverría, C. (2021). Regional Variability in Spanish Public Procurement Standards. Public Procurement Journal, 5(2), 95-118.
Italian National Anti-Corruption Authority. (2020). Annual Report on Transparency and Anti-Corruption in Public Procurement. Retrieved from https://www.anticorruzione.it
Kaczyński, W., & Jasiński, K. (2020). Regional Disparities in Polish Public Procurement Transparency. Journal of Economic Policy, 32(2), 233-251.
Moro Visconti, R. (2021). Challenges in Local Government Procurement Transparency in Italy. Journal of Public Policy, 40(3), 451-468.
Nielsen, L., & Andersen, T. (2020). The Role of Whistleblower Protections in Danish Procurement Transparency. Public Governance Review, 7(1), 112-128.
OECD. (2018). Public Procurement in Sweden and Italy: Transparency Innovations and Standards. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). Reinforcing Public Procurement Transparency in the EU. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2020). Public Procurement for Innovation: Good Practices and Strategies. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2021). Procurement Transparency and Digital Infrastructure in the Netherlands. OECD Reviews on Public Procurement.
Spanish Ministry of Finance. (2020). Implementation of Spain’s Public Sector Procurement Law. Spanish Ministry of Finance Publications.
Transparency International Hungary. (2019). Hungary’s Public Procurement System: Transparency Challenges. Transparency International Hungary. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.hu
Transparency International. (2018). The Role of Transparency in Public Procurement. Transparency International. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org
Transparency International. (2019). Challenges and Successes in French Public Procurement Transparency. Transparency International. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org
World Bank. (2019). The Importance of Transparency in Public Procurement. World Bank Publications.
Zimmerman, K. (2019). Digital Transformation in German Public Procurement: Bund Online 2000. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(4), 556-579.
