Effect of Machine Learning Model on Supply Chain Performance. A Case of Dubai Port (DP) World/Kigali-Rwanda

Authors

  • Eric KAMANZI University of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda
  • Dr. AKUMUNTU Joseph University of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2311

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyse the effect of machine learning model on supply chain performance. Despite this, Dubai Port (DP) World, as a warehouse company, currently faces the challenge of a lack of effective AI explain ability through learning machines together with limited employees in modern AI technology, which is crucial for a successful transition into machine learning for a leading provider of smart logistics solutions, enabling the flow of trade across the globe. In conducting this research, three objectives were laid out to effect of machine learning demand forecasting & planning on supply chain performance in Dubai Port World/Kigali-Rwanda, to assess the effect of machine learning optimization practices on supply chain performance in DP World/Kigali-Rwanda and lastly to determine the effect of machine learning automation on supply chain performance in DP World/Kigali-Rwanda. To achieve these objectives, literature was reviewed on the subject matter including definitions of key concepts, conceptual review, theoretical framework, conceptual framework and research gap analysis. This study based on contingency theory, information processing theory, and practice-based view, additionally researcher applied the universal census by selecting all 131 employees from Dubai Port (DP) World/Kigali, Rwanda. Questionnaire, interview guide and documentation were used as tools of data collection. Data was processed through editing, coding and tabulation and the data also was analyzed by using descriptive statistics. The R value of 0.852 indicates a strong relationship between the predictors and the Supply chain performance in DP World/Kigali-Rwanda. The R Square value of 0.725 indicates that approximately 72.5% of the variability in the outcome variable can be explained by the predictors in the model. Machine learning demand forecasting planning has a coefficient of (β= 0.454, t=8.230, p value=0.000), machine learning optimization practices has a coefficient of (β= 0.252 t=4.125, p value=0.000), and machine learning automation has a coefficient of (β= 0.357, t=6.025, p value=0.000). All these coefficients are statistically significant on supply chain performance in DP World/Kigali-Rwanda, as indicated by their associated Sig. Values below 0.05. Therefore, inline of findings researcher recommended that DP World/Kigali, Rwanda should continue to leverage modern technologies such as Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) to automate shop floor and back-office software-driven processes.

Key words: Machine learning model, supply chain performance and DP World/Kigali, Rwanda.

Author Biographies

Eric KAMANZI, University of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda

Master of Science in Procurement and Supply Chain Management, University of Kigali, Rwanda

Dr. AKUMUNTU Joseph, University of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda

Senior Lecturer, University of Kigali, Rwanda

References

Arsovski, S., Arsovski, Z., Stefanović, M., Tadić, D., & Aleksić, A. (2017). Organisational resilience in a cloud-based enterprise in a supply chain: a challenge for innovative SMEs. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30(4-5), 409-419.

Batrinca, B., Hesse, C. W., & Treleaven, P. C. (2017). Developing a volume forecasting model. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 7(1), 1.

Chowdhary, K. R. (2020). Fundamentals of artificial intelligence (pp. 603-49). New Delhi:: Springer India.

Dash, R., McMurtrey, M., Rebman, C., & Kar, U. K. (2019). Application of artificial intelligence in automation of supply chain management. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 14(3),

Datta, S. (2017). Sourcing, supply chain, and manufacturing of nutraceutical and functional foods. In Developing new functional food and nutraceutical products (pp. 179-193). Academic Press.

Friston, K., Adams, R. A., Perrinet, L., & Breakspear, M. (2016). Perceptions as hypotheses: saccades as experiments. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 151.

Grover, A. K., & Dresner, M. (2022). A theoretical model on how firms can leverage political resources to align with supply chain strategy for competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 58(2), 48-65.

Guo, K., Yang, Z., Yu, C. H., & Buehler, M. J. (2021). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in design of mechanical materials. Materials Horizons, 8(4), 1153-1172.

Gupta, S., Modgil, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Bag, S. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and institutional theories for Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain. In Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal (Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 139-157). Taylor & Francis.

Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and communication: A human–machine communication research agenda. New media & society, 22(1), 70-86.

Howard, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work. American journal of industrial medicine, 62(11), 917-926.

Jain, V., Kumar, S., Soni, U., & Chandra, C. (2017). Supply chain resilience: model development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6779–6800

Kunz, N., & Gold, S. (2017). Humanitarian Action: Aligning Practices with Local Conditions. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 24(3), 78-92.

Kwak, N., & Radler, B. (2022). A comparison between mail and web surveys: Response pattern, respondent profile, and data quality. Journal of official statistics, 18(2), 257.

Naz, M., Shah, J. H., Khan, M. A., Sharif, M., Raza, M., & Damaševičius, R. (2021). From ECG signals to images: a transformation based approach for deep learning. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e386.

Rai, R., Tiwari, M. K., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). Machine learning in manufacturing and industry 4.0 applications. International Journal of Production Research, 59(16), 4773-4778.

Salam, A., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Designing Humanitarian Supply Chains: Considerations for Local Conditions. International Journal of Emergency Management, 15(2), 112-128.

Wadidi, A., Johnson, M. R., Smith, K. L., & Anderson, P. J. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain Management: Autonomy and Decision-Making. Journal of Advanced Logistics, 13(2), 45-60.

Wenzel, H., Smit, D., & Sardesai, S. (2019). A literature review on machine learning in supply chain management. In Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation in Supply Chain Management: Innovative Approaches for Supply Chains. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 27 (pp. 413-441). Berlin: epubli GmbH.

Yao, W. (2017). Analysis on the Application of the Artificial Intelligence Neural Network on the New Energy Micro Grid. Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Machinery, Materials and Computer (MACMC)

Zhang, A., Lipton, Z. C., Li, M., & Smola, A. J. (2021). Dive into deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11342.

Zijm, H., & Klumpp, M. (2016). Logistics and supply chain management: developments and trends. Logistics and supply chain innovation: Bridging the gap between theory and practice, 1-20.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-22

How to Cite

KAMANZI, E., & AKUMUNTU , J. (2024). Effect of Machine Learning Model on Supply Chain Performance. A Case of Dubai Port (DP) World/Kigali-Rwanda. Journal of Procurement & Supply Chain, 8(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2311

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)